Post-electoral Guinea has initiated a transition from authoritarianism to democracy, presenting an opportunity for strengthening constitutionalism and the rule of law. A qualitative comparative analysis will be employed to evaluate the adequacy of current laws and practices against international standards of constitutionalism and the rule of law. Findings indicate that while Guinea's constitution aims at establishing a liberal democracy, certain institutional structures are underdeveloped, particularly in terms of judicial independence and checks on executive power. The legal system in post-electoral Guinea requires significant reform to align with constitutional ideals, focusing on enhancing judicial integrity and strengthening oversight mechanisms. Recommendations include the creation of a specialized court for electoral disputes, increased funding for public defenders' offices, and enhanced training programmes for judges and prosecutors.
Gassama et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: