Agriculture is rapidly becoming a data-driven field where automation relies on transforming 2D images into accurate 3D models. However, selecting the most effective method remains challenging due to the unconstrained nature of the environment. This review assesses the effectiveness of geometry-based, sensor-based, and learning-based reconstruction methodologies in agricultural settings. We analyze photogrammetric pipelines, active sensing, and neural rendering methods based on their geometric accuracy, data processing speed, and field performance against wind or occlusion. Our analysis indicates that while Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is highly accurate, it is too expensive for widespread adoption. Conversely, geometry-based methods are inexpensive but struggle with complex biological structures. Learning-based methods, especially 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), have revolutionized the field by enabling a balance between visual fidelity and real-time inference speed. We conclude that the best chance for scalability and accuracy lies in hybrid pipelines that integrate Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) with geometric priors. We believe that “hybrid intelligence” systems, such as edge-native 3D Gaussian Splatting combined with semantic priors, are the future of 3D reconstruction. These systems will enable the creation of real-time, spatiotemporal (4D) digital twins that drive automated decision-making in precision agriculture.
Sankaramaddi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.