Abstract ABSTRACT: During the 1970s, the SEC expanded the scope of required disclosure and initiated what might be loosely described as a "continuous disclosure system." This note reviews key aspects of the "continuous disclosure" of unusual events in light of the Hakansson 1977 framework and addresses the issues of the manifestation of the continuous disclosure policy, the type of new information required, the timeliness of that information, and the use of mandated information by investors. The evidence indicates that SEC disclosure policy does meet the minimum conditions for utility.
Victor Pastena (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: