The Pre-Trial Chamber plays an important role during the investigation stage and its role appears in the stage of considering the challenge to jurisdiction or admissibility. In the same context, the Statute stipulates that the decisions of the Pre-Trial Chamber may be appealed and indicates that there are decisions issued by the Pre-Trial Chamber that require its permission to be appealed, and other decisions that do not need to be appealed. Her permission.The research problem is manifested through the presence of the control of the Public Prosecution; which previously enjoyed absolute powers during the investigation, but after the existence of the basic system, which approved the existence of the Judicial Oversight Authority represented by the Preliminary Chamber, the system granted it the authority to cancel any decision that appears to be contrary to the law, and this problem raises several questions, the most important of which is whether all the decisions of the Public Prosecutor are subject to cancellation, whether the Public Prosecutor is bound by the decisions of the Preliminary Chamber, and whether all the decisions of the Chamber are subject to appeal. This is what we are trying to answer in this research. In this study, we adopted the legal analytical approach by analyzing the legal texts related to appeal and shedding light on them. The research ended with results and recommendations.
Hussein et al. (Sun,) studied this question.