The Effective Management of Shock: Moving From Physiology to Guidelines to Personalized Medicine

Central to managing critically ill patients is the identification of the etiology of cardiorespiratory insufficiency (i.e., shock), early appropriate targeted therapies to support the cardiorespiratory system to sustain adequate blood flow and oxygen to the tissues, plus specific treatments to reverse the cause of shock. Over the past 40 years, numerous advances in our understanding of shock, its severity, and its response to therapies, along with more specific and insightful monitoring approaches, have been developed. This perspective summarizes some aspects of that progress. We have come a long way, but we need to understand three things. First, that once organ injury has occurred all that our treatments can do is mitigate further injury, not reverse it. If initial aggressive resurrection efforts cannot restore organ function, then their actions often cause only iatrogenic injury. Second, existing advanced monitoring devices, no matter how insightful their data, will not improve patient outcomes unless coupled to a treatment that itself improves outcomes. Finally, all our advances over these years have underscored the fundamental need for having a thoughtful and observant bedside clinician cognizant of the pathophysiologic underpinnings of disease and its care who titrates care based on the patient’s individual response.