Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly entering surgical practice through applications such as risk prediction, clinical decision support, automated documentation, and digital patient communication. While these technologies offer opportunities to improve efficiency and data integration, their growing presence also raises important ethical, clinical, and professional questions. This Perspective examines the implications of AI for surgical care, emphasizing the continuing importance of human judgment, relational responsibility, and ethical discernment in technologically augmented clinical environments. Building on philosophical concepts of practical wisdom ( phronesis ) and clinical discernment, the article argues that AI systems—although capable of generating clinically relevant information—lack sentience, moral agency, and experiential understanding. Consequently, algorithmic outputs cannot replace the interpretive role of surgeons in complex clinical decisions. The discussion translates these reflections into concrete implications for surgical practice across the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative phases, including shared decision-making, team communication, and postoperative patient care. The article also addresses key challenges in the real-world deployment of medical AI, including workflow integration, transparency, safety monitoring, and potential algorithmic bias affecting health equity. Ultimately, the responsible integration of AI in surgery requires maintaining the centrality of the surgeon–patient relationship and ensuring that technological innovation remains aligned with the humanistic foundations of surgical care.
Rimoli et al. (Sun,) studied this question.