Large language models increasingly serve as primary information sources across critical domains, yet fundamental limitations persist in their logical reasoning capabilities. Even state-of-the-art models systematically fail on inference patterns involving conditionals and modals (might, must), the fundamental linguistic tools humans use to reason about possibilities, necessities, and hypothetical scenarios. Recent research reveals that language models make distinct types of errors with conditionals versus modals, both of which require immediate attention. This study investigates seven challenging inference patterns through targeted logical analysis and proposes the LogiCue framework, a pattern-specific prompting approach that addresses the root causes of these reasoning failures.
Shahrokhshahi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.