Background/Objectives: In Japan, hospital births predominate, with home births comprising only 0.1% of deliveries. This study assessed how documented practices for planned home births attended by independent midwives align with national guidelines and WHO intrapartum care recommendations, and assess maternal and neonatal differences before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Records of 430 low-risk pregnant women who received continuous care at a private midwifery home over 25 years were reviewed. After excluding 8 maternal and 22 neonatal transfers, 400 records were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were compared with WHO recommendations and between the pre-pandemic (1999–2019) and post-pandemic (2020–2024) periods. Results: All women experienced spontaneous singleton cephalic labors with intermittent fetal heart rate auscultation. The mean gestational age was 277.3 days and the median labor duration was 303.5 min. Labor onset was spontaneous in 83.5% of cases. Nearly half of the women had no perineal lacerations. Postpartum blood loss ≥500 mL occurred in 14.1% of cases. Family presence was nearly universal. Neonates had a mean birth weight of 3129.0 g and high Apgar scores. Skin-to-skin contact occurred in 52.9%; exclusive breastfeeding reached 93.8% at 1 month. Post-pandemic births showed higher maternal age and higher neonatal birth weight, although these differences should be interpreted cautiously due to the small post-pandemic sample. Conclusions: Independent midwives provided evidence-based, physiologically oriented care, partially aligning with selected WHO intrapartum recommendations during planned home births. Midwife-led home births may support positive childbirth experiences and favorable maternal/neonatal outcomes for low-risk women. Post-pandemic shifts underscore the need for continued monitoring and flexible, community-based perinatal support, while recognizing the limitations of retrospective, single-site data.
Murakami et al. (Mon,) studied this question.