Accurate urban expansion mapping in dryland environments is essential for sustainable planning, infrastructure management, and heritage-sensitive development, yet it remains methodologically challenging because built-up surfaces often exhibit strong spectral similarity to bright bare soils. This study comparatively evaluates three widely used urban mapping approaches in Diriyah, Saudi Arabia, a rapidly transforming heritage district of high relevance to Saudi Vision 2030: the Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL), the Normalized Difference Built-up Index (NDBI), and unsupervised k-means classification. Built-up extent was mapped for 2015, 2020, and 2025, and method performance was assessed using 150 stratified reference points interpreted from high-resolution imagery. The results reveal substantial quantitative differences among methods. GHSL produced the most conservative estimates of urban extent (2.80, 4.94, and 5.31 km2), while NDBI and unsupervised classification generated much larger and less realistic built-up areas due to spectral confusion with bright bare soil. Accuracy assessment confirmed the superiority of GHSL, which achieved the highest overall accuracy (0.88) and Kappa coefficient (0.83), compared with NDBI (0.53; 0.41) and unsupervised classification (0.61; 0.50). To support integrative interpretation, the study also developed a Hybrid Built-up Detection Model (HBDM), which combines the three outputs into a continuous urban intensity layer that helps distinguish persistent urban cores from uncertain transition zones. The findings demonstrate that conservative global built-up products provide a more reliable baseline than index-based or unsupervised methods in bright-soil dryland settings. More broadly, the study offers practical methodological guidance for urban monitoring and sustainable land management in desert cities undergoing rapid transformation under large-scale development agendas such as Saudi Vision 2030.
Muhannad Mohammed Alfehaid (Sun,) studied this question.