This article presents an analysis and evaluation of protective mechanisms used after a procedural decision in international arbitration. The study covers a broad spectrum of protective means, including enforcement, compensation for damage, annulment, appeal, and review of arbitral decisions. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the impact of international and national legal norms, including the New York Convention, on the effectiveness of these mechanisms. The article aims to identify ways to improve the protection system to ensure a fair balance between the interests of investors and the sovereign rights of states in the context of international arbitration.
Dmitry Semenovich Belkin (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: