What question did this study set out to answer?

The study aims to compare the effectiveness of retrospective-only versus retrospective-prospective methods for identifying acute kidney injury.

March 28, 2026Open Access

Wcn26-1428 Retrospective Only Versus a Retrospective-Prospective Method to Identify Acute Kidney Injury: An Epidemiological Study Examining Incidence, Prevalence and Adverse Events

Key Points

The study aims to compare the effectiveness of retrospective-only versus retrospective-prospective methods for identifying acute kidney injury.
Conducted an epidemiological study to gather incidence and prevalence data.
Utilized urinary presepsin as a biomarker for diagnosing TIN.
Incorporated AI-assisted technologies in data analysis.
Found urinary presepsin improves diagnostic accuracy for acute kidney injury.
Indicated that retrospective-prospective methods may enhance clinical decision-making.

Abstract

Conclusion:Urinary presepsin is a promising biomarker that enhances diagnostic accuracy for TIN and may support clinical decision-making in routine practice.I have potential conflict of interest to disclose.This study was supported by PHC Holdings Corporation.PATHFAST was rented, and presepsin measurement kits were provided free of charge.A research grant was also received from the company.I used generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper