The alpine meadows on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau function as critical reservoirs for regional water resources, yet face severe degradation driven by climate warming and overgrazing. Although establishing Poa pratensis artificial grasslands is a common restoration strategy, their effectiveness in recovering hydrological functions along restoration chronosequence remains poorly quantified. This study evaluated the changes in water conservation capacity and its drivers across a degradation–restoration sequence in the Qilian Mountains comprising alpine meadow (AM), degraded meadow (DM), and 2-, 3-, and 13-year artificial grasslands (AG2, AG3, AG13). Vegetation characteristics, soil structural properties, and water-holding indices were measured to assess restoration outcomes. The results showed that compared to AM, water-holding capacity at 0–30 cm in DM declined by 75.3–85.8%, primarily due to fragmentation of the mattic epipedon and deterioration of soil aggregates. While artificial restoration improved vegetation traits and some soil properties, hydrological recovery exhibited a distinct lag. Specifically, soil water-holding capacity in artificial grasslands showed no statistically significant improvement compared to DM. Even in AG13, soil water storage remained significantly lower than that in AM. Mantel tests and regression analyses identified root mass density and mean weight diameter as the primary drivers governing water conservation capacity. These findings reveal that artificial grasslands cannot serve as functional hydrological reservoirs in a timely manner, highlighting the importance of conserving intact alpine ecosystems.
Zhao et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: