Early and sustained introduction of nanotechnology to freshmen will aid in arming undergraduates with information in order to make informed decisions about nanotechnology, and recruiting undergraduates to the nanotechnology workforce. Ferrofluid synthesis provides an opportunity for students to 1) learn and demonstrate proper laboratory techniques, 2) experience the consequences of improper laboratory technique, and 3) be introduced and potentially recruited to nanoscience. At our institution, ferrofluid synthesis, along with contextual examples of ferrofluid use (in vehicles, medical imaging, and art), was implemented into the general chemistry curriculum as the first experiment. Despite the novice laboratory skills of our students, 92.9% of students (N = 1714) successfully synthesized a magnetic ferrofluid. Students obtaining non-magnetic products provided valid self-evaluative explanations that, in general, highlighted the importance of proper laboratory techniques (precise measurements, proper labeling, etc.). Teaching assistant opinions about this experiment were generally positive with all teaching assistants recommending continuation of this experiment. A dramatic increase in undergraduate inquiries about nanoscience and research in general as a result of this experiment and the ensuing classroom examples has been observed. Currently, five undergraduate students are engaged in the preparation of ferrofluid for studies of self-organized magnetocomposite materials, energy-generating and catalytic materials, biomedical applications, and fundamental surface chemistry, and 3 of 5 have indicated increased interest in pursuing scientific research careers. This type of active, relevant experiment has the potential to motivate students in ways that are difficult to achieve by other means.
Richards-Babb et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: