Despite the widespread adoption of BIM, information exchange across disciplines remains hindered by heterogeneous structures at the tabular data level, particularly when integrating data across multiple discipline-specific models. Manual mapping, rigid templates, or one-off programming scripts are labor-intensive and difficult to scale, limiting automated querying, cross-model aggregation, and schedule-level analytics. This study proposes a lightweight, workflow-driven approach for semantic normalization and cross-model integration of BIM schedule data, with optional script-supported workflow configuration used only to assist the configuration of deterministic, rule-guided mapping logic, rather than serving as a core analytical method. By introducing a customizable subcategory layer, the workflow enables fine-grained semantic alignment and efficient normalization across diverse schedule datasets, implemented through lightweight Python scripting and rule-guided semantic matching used solely as a supporting mechanism for deterministic field mapping. Using structural, architectural, and HVAC models, we demonstrate a stepwise process including data cleaning, hierarchical classification, consistency checking, batch analytics, and automated computation of cross-model metrics such as opening-to-wall ratios. Sample-based validation confirms the workflow’s reliability, achieving semantic mapping agreement rates above 95% and reducing manual processing time by more than 85%. The workflow is readily extensible to other disciplines and modeling conventions, supporting high-throughput data integration for tasks such as design coordination, semantic alignment, RFI reduction, accelerated design reviews, and data-driven decision making. Overall, rather than introducing a new algorithm, the contribution of this work lies in formalizing a reusable, schedule-level workflow abstraction that enables consistent semantic alignment and automated cross-model aggregation without relying on rigid ontologies or training-intensive learning-based models. Any optional tooling used during workflow configuration is auxiliary and does not constitute a standalone learning-based method requiring model training or performance benchmarking. This provides a reusable methodological foundation for scalable, schedule-level BIM data integration and cross-model analytics.
Zhao et al. (Sat,) studied this question.