The paper analyzes the results of the Social Well-being Survey, which consists of personal, relational, and societal well-being in seven provinces of Indonesia. The mean of social well-being is 7.3 while personal and relational well-being means are 8.03 and 6.90, respectively. The variables that have a significant correlation to both personal and relational well-being are educational background, asset, residence, family social status, citizenship, native origin, local belief, race, and ethnicity. Societal well-being is the individual perception on well-being at the macro, systemic, and holistic level of society; its score is at a moderate level (6.2), and its indicators are equal opportunity in higher education (7.8), inclusive treatment for the disabled (7.5), institutional trust (6.6), and a positive view of society's progress regarding the income gap (3.0). The findings also show that it is important to pay more attention to religious and spiritual factors that can enhance social well-being. Finally, the implementation of "happiness mainstreaming" policies can improve social well-being at the micro-individual, meso-relational, and macro-societal levels.
Wirutomo et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: