This article explores the relevance of the Genocide Convention of 1948 in the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, particularly between Palestinians and their allies in Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq, versus Israel and its Western allies. Established to prevent genocide following the atrocities of World War II, the Convention obligates signatories to act against genocide and hold perpetrators accountable. However, the current geopolitical climate suggests that national interests are increasingly overshadowing the principles of international law and justice. This paper critiques the role of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in promoting peace amid rising tensions and examines the conflicting priorities evident in the United Nations General Assembly. Drawing on postcolonialism and communitarianism theories, this article assesses the commitment of key Security Council members to uphold global justice, particularly in response to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The findings indicate that without a shared moral framework and a genuine commitment to justice, the international community risks descending into chaos.
Lucas Mafu (Tue,) studied this question.