Background/Objectives: Nonpharmaceutical interventions such as social distancing and face mask use were central to controlling infectious disease transmission during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly when vaccines and treatments were limited or unevenly available. Although public health strategies emphasized individual compliance, adherence varied widely. Empirical evidence remains limited regarding how individuals integrate influences across individual, interpersonal, and community levels when assessing their ability and readiness to socially distance. This study examined how residents evaluated, prioritized, and experienced multi-level factors shaping perceived ability and readiness to practice social distancing during the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of adults (≥18 years) residing in St. Louis City and St. Louis County, Missouri, between April and July 2020. Participants selected and ranked individual/interpersonal and community-level factors influencing social distancing and provided open-ended explanations of their choices. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively to assess selection frequency and ranking priority. Qualitative responses were analyzed using iterative thematic coding to examine how participants interpreted and combined these factors. Results: The analytic sample included 1692 respondents. At the individual/interpersonal level, family and friends’ distancing behavior (58.9%), desire for in-person interaction (52.4%), and personal risk of COVID-19 (48.9%) were frequently selected, while personal risk, caring for others, and ability to work from home were most often ranked as the highest priority. At the community level, others’ distancing in public spaces (66.2%), availability of COVID-19 testing (58.9%), and businesses’ ability to ensure distancing and sanitation (57.2%) were most frequently selected, with epidemic severity, testing availability, and treatment availability ranked as most influential. Qualitative findings indicated that respondents experienced these influences as interconnected, integrating personal and relational risk, local epidemic conditions, healthcare access, visible community norms, and employer policies. Conclusions: Perceived ability and readiness to practice social distancing emerge from interdependent social and structural conditions rather than isolated individual motivations. Public health responses to emerging infectious diseases may be more effective when individual-level guidance is complemented by accessible testing and treatment, supportive workplace policies, and community environments that visibly reinforce protective behaviors.
Tetteh et al. (Thu,) studied this question.