The stability of underground building foundations in fractured rock masses is a critical concern in geotechnical engineering, particularly for urban projects situated in complex geological settings. In such environments, the interaction between weak planes, groundwater seepage, and in situ stress plays a decisive role in controlling deformation and failure mechanisms. This study presents a novel weak plane–seepage–stress coupling model specifically developed to evaluate the stability of underground excavations and foundation walls under these challenging conditions. Unlike conventional approaches that often assume isotropy or consider isolated factors, the proposed model integrates multiple interacting variables—including weak plane orientation, seepage coefficient, and excavation direction—to systematically assess their combined influence on stress redistribution and failure pressure. A key innovation lies in the quantitative evaluation of the permeability-sealing coefficient, which reflects the effectiveness of waterproofing measures, and its coupling with weak plane characteristics. The results demonstrate that weak planes significantly alter the surrounding stress field, inducing directional instability. The optimal excavation orientation for minimizing instability is identified within the range of 200° to 280°. Moreover, increasing δ from 0 to 1 leads to a substantial reduction in the required supporting pressure, underscoring the critical role of effective sealing and waterproofing in enhancing foundation stability. While the current model is based on a single weak plane assumption and focuses on short-term mechanical responses, it provides a foundational framework for understanding coupled instability mechanisms. Future work will extend the model to incorporate multi-set weak planes, time-dependent degradation, and dynamic excavation processes. This research offers both theoretical insights and practical guidance for optimizing geotechnical design in fractured rock environments, contributing to more resilient and sustainable underground construction.
Wang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: