Britain’s decision to allow the United States to use RAF Fairford and Diego Garcia in military action tied to the Iran crisis raises a simple but serious question. Can a state still call itself restrained when it provides the territory, access, and infrastructure that enable escalation? This article argues that it cannot. Once British-controlled facilities become operational enablers of war, Britain no longer appears like a distant observer. It becomes part of the conflict in the region's eyes, and likely in the calculations of any state considering retaliation. The article also argues that this choice weakens Britain’s diplomatic credibility, deepens legal and political risk, and exposes British citizens to strategic and economic costs that have not been honestly explained.
Sahib Usman (Tue,) studied this question.