Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the United States raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U. S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U. S. consumers and firms that buy imports was 51 billion, or 0. 27% of GDP. We embed the estimated trade elasticities in a general-equilibrium model of the U. S. economy. After accounting for tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers, the aggregate real income loss was 7. 2 billion, or 0. 04% of GDP. Import tariffs favored sectors concentrated in politically competitive counties, and the model implies that tradeable-sector workers in heavily Republican counties were the most negatively affected due to the retaliatory tariffs. JEL Code: F1.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fajgelbaum et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d78f2eb843b2be994904d8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz036
Pablo Fajgelbaum
University of California, Los Angeles
Pinelopi Goldberg
Dartmouth College
Patrick Kennedy
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, Los Angeles
National Bureau of Economic Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: