What question did this study set out to answer?

The central aim was to encourage residents to bring trash cans in after collection to prevent street clutter.

April 10, 2026

The Combined Effect of Binding Communication and the Hypocrisy Paradigm: An Application in the Context Of Waste Management / El efecto combinado de la comunicación vinculante y el paradigma de la hipocresía: una aplicación en el ámbito de la gestión de residuos

Key Points

The central aim was to encourage residents to bring trash cans in after collection to prevent street clutter.
Engaged 164 households in a French city through three intervention strategies.
Compared binding communication, binding communication with hypocrisy paradigm, and informational messages.
Analyzed changes in the mean percentages of trash cans left on the street before and after interventions.
Binding communication significantly reduced the number of trash cans left on the street compared to other methods.
The hypocrisy paradigm interfered with the effectiveness of binding communication.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to encourage inhabitants in a French city to take their trash cans in after they had been collected, in order to not clutter the street during the day. A total of 164 households were approached by city officials and three different interventions were compared: the first was based on binding communication, the second on binding communication coupled with the hypocrisy paradigm, and a third was an informational message. Changes in the mean percentages of trash cans left on the street before and after the interventions indicated that binding communication was significantly more effective than the other two interventions. The fact that the hypocrisy paradigm can block the effect of binding communication is discussed in terms of the dissonance reduction mode.

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Pascual et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894ad6c1944d70ce05999 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/21711976261434307

Bookmark