Interobserver agreement with the new BI-RADS terminology is good and validates the US lexicon. Subcategories 4a, 4b, and 4c are useful in predicting the likelihood of malignancy.

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Lazarus et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d89f5a52654bb436d19896 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2392042127

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment.1999 · 145 citations
2Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.1979 · 23,020 citations
3Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.1995 · 1,780 citations
4The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data1977 · 78,934 citations
5BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy1999 · 390 citations

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment.1999 · 145 citations
2Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.1979 · 23,020 citations
3Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.1995 · 1,780 citations
4The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data1977 · 78,934 citations
5BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy1999 · 390 citations