Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ADCmean was significantly lower in patients with HPV+ve than HPV-ev, (P = 0.001), cut off value of (800 ± 0.44*10-3mm2/s) with 76.9% sensitivity, and 72.2% specificity is able to differentiate between the two groups. No significant differences were found between FDG parameters (SUVmax, TLG, and MTV), and HPV status, (P = 0.873, P = 0.958, and P = 0.817), respectively. Comparison between CR and NCR groups; ADCmean, TLG, and MTV were predictive parameters of treatment response, (P = 0.017, P = 0.013, and P = 0.014), respectively. HPV+ve group shows a higher probability of lymph nodes involvement, (P = 0.006) CONCLUSION: Our study found that pretreatment ADC of the primary tumor can predict HPV status and treatment response. On the other hand, metabolic PET parameters (TLG, and MTV) were able to predict primary tumor response to therapy.
Freihat et al. (Thu,) studied this question.