Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Starch synthesis in leaves was increased by phosphate starvation or by treatments which decreased cytoplasmic orthophosphate levels (such as mannose feeding). Usually less than 30% of the total carbon fixed during CO(2) assimilation was incorporated into starch in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), spinach beet (Beta vulgaris), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves.In isolated spinach chloroplasts, formation of starch from CO(2) was usually less than in leaves. In the absence of significant levels of 3-phosphoglycerate, concentrations of phosphate as low as 1 mm (in the medium) or 10 mm (in the stroma) almost completely inhibited starch synthesis. The inhibitory action of phosphate could be overcome by 3-phosphoglycerate. The controlling factor of starch synthesis appeared to be the ratio of phosphoglycerate to orthophosphate rather than the stromal hexose monophosphate concentration, and it is suggested that this control is exerted via the phosphate translocator and the known allosteric regulation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Starch synthesis was also favored by the presence of dihydroxyacetone phosphate and by high light and high temperature. Oxygen was inhibitory, probably owing to carbon drain into glycolate. Starch formation by intact chloroplasts could not be promoted by added glucose or glucose 6-phosphate.Starch mobilization in the dark was promoted by orthophosphate and phosphate-dependent mobilization was inhibited by phosphoglycerate. The principal products of starch breakdown in the presence of phosphate were the transport metabolites dihydroxyacetone phosphate and 3-phosphoglycerate. Formation of these compounds from starch was stimulated by ATP or oxaloacetate. In a phosphate-independent reaction, starch was also converted to neutral products such as maltose and glucose. The rates of phosphate-dependent starch degradation phosphorolysis were very much higher than those of starch hydrolysis for which there was no phosphate requirement.
Heldt et al. (Wed,) studied this question.