Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Brain-based deception research began only two decades ago and has since included a wide variety of contexts and response modalities for deception paradigms. Investigations of this sort serve to better our neuroscientific and legal knowledge of the ways in which individuals deceive others. To this end, we conducted activation likelihood estimation (ALE) and meta-analytic connectivity modelling (MACM) using BrainMap software to examine 45 task-based fMRI brain activation studies on deception. An activation likelihood estimation comparing activations during deceptive versus honest behavior revealed 7 significant peak activation clusters (bilateral insula, left superior frontal gyrus, bilateral supramarginal gyrus, and bilateral medial frontal gyrus). Meta-analytic connectivity modelling revealed an interconnected network amongst the 7 regions comprising both unidirectional and bidirectional connections. Together with subsequent behavioral and paradigm decoding, these findings implicate the supramarginal gyrus as a key component for the sociocognitive process of deception.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sarah Meier
University of Exeter
Kimberly L. Ray
The University of Texas at Austin
Juliana C. Mastan
University of New Hampshire
PLoS ONE
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
The University of Texas at Austin
University of New Hampshire
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Meier et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69db5e21e6ab964fb0836ecd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248909
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: