Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The impact of measurement error in dietary assessment instruments on the design, analysis and interpretation of nutritional studies may be much greater than has been previously estimated, at least regarding protein intake.

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kipnis et al. (Sun,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbd3237d378569a98361ec https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2002383

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents1990 · 643 citations
2The influence of fatness, weight change, slimming history and other lifestyle variables on diet reporting in Danish men and women aged 35-65 years.1993 · 101 citations
3Human protein requirements: nitrogen balance response to graded levels of egg protein in elderly men and women1978 · 106 citations
4Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24 hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle-aged women, retired men and post-obese subjects: comparisons with validation against presumed energy requirements1997 · 149 citations
5Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease.1988 · 3,394 citations

Bookmark

View Full Paper