Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Clinical evaluation and MR imaging are currently the cornerstone of brain tumor progression monitoring. However, this is complicated by the occurrence of treatment effects such as pseudoprogression and radionecrosis. While essential for patient management, the distinction from true progression remains a significant challenge. Moreover, MR imaging provides limited real-time insights into tumor heterogeneity, genetic divergence, and treatment resistance. Although surgical histopathological biopsies can yield additional valuable information, they are not always conclusive, invasive, and therefore, not suitable for longitudinal measurements. In the era of precision medicine, there is a critical need for minimally invasive, accurate, and cost-effective monitoring methods for both primary brain tumors and brain metastases. Liquid biopsies have emerged as a potential candidate. Various analytes, including circulating nucleic acids, extracellular vesicles, platelet RNAs, and circulating tumor cells, can be obtained from whole blood and its derivatives, as well as other body fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid. In this narrative review, we outline the potential of liquid biopsies for the management of gliomas and brain metastases in adults and emphasize their utility in monitoring disease progression and treatment response. We discuss the most studied biofluids and analytes, along with their respective advantages and downsides. Furthermore, we address key considerations for future research and biobanking to pave the way for clinical implementation.
Dwarshuis et al. (Sat,) studied this question.