Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction: The term occupational disruption is used increasingly throughout the occupational science and therapy literature. Despite frequent mentions, a clear understanding of the concept and its use is lacking. Aim: The purpose of this scoping review was to conceptualise occupational disruption by explaining how the term is described and understood. Methods: Levac, Colquhoun, and O’Brien’s (2010) refinements to Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review methodology were used to map the research literature around occupational disruption. Results: Occupational disruption is present in the literature in a number of contexts, with discussions relating to impact on identity, management strategies, and engagement in social relationships and valued occupations. However, the term was used inconsistently throughout the literature. Conclusions: An enhanced conceptualization of occupational disruption will promote understanding of its effects and implications, allowing researchers to apply the concept to diverse populations.
Nizzero et al. (Sun,) studied this question.