Recent scholarship has aimed to expand the concept of political scandal by examining problematic statements made by public figures, often termed “talk scandals.” However, a major limitation of existing studies is the lack of clear differentiation between gaffes and talk scandals. This study aims to better understand talk scandals by focusing on the political dynamics, including the relationship between the media and politics, that generate them. Using a new collection of political gaffes, we examine the frequency of gaffes associated with different cabinet positions, the locations of gaffes, the durations of gaffes, and the major societal actors who expressed offense at statements made by Japanese cabinet ministers. Through quantitative analysis and case studies, we explore why problematic statements escalate into scandals while others quickly fade from public attention. Our analysis suggests that the news media alone cannot independently transform a gaffe into a talk scandal. Instead, journalists must reference and justify their coverage by citing clear criticisms from offended groups or individuals. These statements tend to develop into talk scandals only when they receive strong and sustained criticism within the political arena.
Carlson et al. (Tue,) studied this question.