This article presents a critical-propositional reading of Gianluca Alberti’s book The Structural Organization of the Cosmos: An Electrodynamic Framework Beyond Gravity-First Models in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Alberti’s proposal that gravitation should be understood not as the primary organizing cause of the cosmos, but as an effective description of motion within systems previously structured by electrodynamic interactions, collective field effects, plasma-mediated processes, and organized energy-density distributions. The article develops a systematic comparison between Alberti’s electrodynamic framework and the modal, ontological, and cosmogonic discipline of the Theory of Objectivity. It identifies important points of compatibility, especially in the critique of gravity-first assumptions, in the emphasis on structure prior to dynamic description, and in the centrality attributed to fields, boundaries, magnetism, and organized media. At the same time, it argues that Alberti’s framework remains primarily physical-regional and does not fully reach the deeper modal and ontological level required by the Seven Absolute Truths of the Theory of Objectivity. The text is organized as a full scientific article in Chicago author-date style, including abstract, analytical sections, bibliography, and a final appendix in TO style. Its main conclusion is that Alberti’s contribution may be received as a highly relevant regional physics of cosmic organization, while not constituting, in itself, a first ontology of the universe. Authors’ Note: This analytical study was produced with the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Gianluca Alberti; electrodynamics; gravity; cosmology; modal ontology; cosmic structure; plasma physics; magnetism; critical-propositional analysis; philosophy of physics; planetary genesis; galactic dynamics; solar light deflection.
Cabannas et al. (Mon,) studied this question.