What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to examine how e-commerce contract laws vary and converge between the UAE and UK. It investigates mechanisms for improving international dispute resolution.

April 22, 2026

Commentary: Legal Convergence in E-Commerce Contracts: A Comparative Analysis

NJNashat Mahmoud Jaradt

Key Points

The aim is to examine how e-commerce contract laws vary and converge between the UAE and UK. It investigates mechanisms for improving international dispute resolution.
Conducted a comparative analysis of e-commerce legal frameworks in the UAE and UK.
Reviewed relevant case law and regulatory practices.
Identified actionable steps for harmonizing dispute mechanisms.
Identified key differences in dispute resolution methods: arbitration in the UAE vs. ODR in the UK.
Highlighted socio-economic and cultural factors influencing legal frameworks.
Proposed strategies to enhance cooperation and align with global standards in digital commerce.

Abstract

This paper explores the dynamics of legal convergence and divergence in e-commerce contract laws, with a comparative focus on the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the United Kingdom (UK). While the UAE, grounded in its civil law tradition, prioritizes arbitration and mediation for dispute resolution, the UK, guided by its common law roots, advances Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platforms. These differences reflect broader socio-economic, cultural, and legal influences unique to each jurisdiction. By drawing on a detailed comparative analysis of legal frameworks, case law, and regulatory practices, this paper aims to identify actionable steps to harmonize crossborder dispute mechanisms. Ultimately, the study proposes pathways for fostering international cooperation and aligning with global standards, thereby advancing trust and innovation in digital commerce.

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper