Multipath propagation presents a major challenge to acoustic communication, causing signal distortion, delay spread, and inter-symbol interference, which degrade data integrity. This study investigates the use of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) as a robust modulation strategy for communication in complex acoustic environments where radio frequency (RF) propagation is severely attenuated. Using a software-defined radio (SDR) platform implemented in GNU Radio, OFDM performance was experimentally evaluated against Binary Frequency Shift Keying (BFSK) and Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) under simulated and real multipath conditions in materials including air, water, and steel. The results show that OFDM achieves consistently lower bit error rates (BERs) and greater resilience to multipath interference due to its sub-carrier orthogonality and cyclic-prefix structure. The research also highlights how the frequency selectivity and coherence bandwidth of acoustic channels influence modulation performance across different media. By implementing custom transducers and real-time baseband processing, the study demonstrates how software-defined acoustics can be adapted for highly reflective and frequency-dependent environments. The observed improvements in BER and signal stability validate OFDM’s effectiveness in maintaining data integrity despite time and frequency dispersion effects. These findings demonstrate that OFDM enables reliable acoustic data transmission across heterogeneous media and is well suited to sensor-network applications in RF-hostile environments such as railway infrastructure, sealed containers, and submerged systems. Future work will include quantitative channel characterisation—specifically measuring delay spread, coherence bandwidth, and impulse response profiles—to further optimise OFDM parameters and provide a generalisable framework for adaptive modulation in dynamic acoustic channels.
Alldritt et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: