Background/Objectives: The modified Budin radiographic technique is a practical alternative to CT for measuring femoral neck anteversion (FNA); however, the impact of hip abduction angle on its accuracy remains unclear. This experimental study examined how varying abduction angles affect agreement between modified Budin measurements and CT. Methods: Twenty-seven dry adult femora underwent CT scanning, and FNA was measured using a validated three-slice superimposition method as the reference standard. Modified Budin radiographs were obtained at 20°, 30°, and 40° of femoral abduction. Two orthopedic surgeons independently measured FNA on all images twice, with at least 15 days between measurements. Intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Mean values per femur were analyzed. Agreement with CT was evaluated using Pearson correlation, Bland–Altman analysis, and absolute error comparisons across abduction angles. Results: Reliability was excellent across all modalities (ICC, 0.982–0.998). Mean CT-derived FNA was 10.0° ± 8.5°, compared with 9.1° ± 8.0° at 20°, 8.3° ± 7.8° at 30°, and 7.8° ± 7.5° at 40° of abduction (p < 0.001). Correlation with CT was strong at all positions, but systematic underestimation increased with abduction angle. Among the tested positions, 20° abduction showed the smallest bias, the narrowest limits of agreement, and the lowest absolute error. Conclusions: Hip abduction angle significantly influences the accuracy of the modified Budin view. Under controlled experimental conditions, 20° abduction provided the closest agreement with CT among the tested positions. These findings suggest that lower abduction angles may improve geometric accuracy, although clinical feasibility and performance must be confirmed in vivo before routine clinical application can be recommended.
Yuncu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: