Understanding how individual researcher behaviors aggregate into collective scientific out- comes remains a central challenge in the science of science. We introduce Scientific Liquidity Agents (SLA), a novel multi-agent framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to simulate researcher behavior in a scientific knowledge market environment. Drawing inspiration from financial market simulation frameworks, SLA applies market concepts—knowledge liq- uidity, friction, and epistemic arbitrage—to model the scientific ecosystem. At the micro-level, we employ the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) cognitive framework to model heterogeneous re- searcher agents with diverse skills, behavioral tendencies, and incentive functions. At the macro- level, we simulate a dynamic knowledge graph and collaboration network that enables informa- tion exchange and idea propagation.Our key innovation is the introduction of Epistemic Arbitrageur Agents—specialized re- searchers who reduce system-wide friction by bridging disciplinary boundaries and facilitating cross-domain knowledge transfer. We validate the framework through a simulation of 10 LLM- driven agents over 100 steps, producing 280 publications with a 78% success rate. Key findings include: (1) emergent role differentiation (Arbitrageurs span 3.0 domains vs 1.0 for Special- ists); (2) productivity clustering (Lag-1 autocorrelation: +0.155); and (3) realistic publication tier distributions. The framework successfully reproduces stylized facts observed in real scientific ecosystems, including volatility clustering and knowledge concentration dynamics.
Koutian WU (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: