What question did this study set out to answer?

To highlight the contributions of Alf Sommerfelt to the field of linguistics and sociolinguistics.

April 24, 2026Open Access

Alf Axelssøn Sommerfelt

Key Points

To highlight the contributions of Alf Sommerfelt to the field of linguistics and sociolinguistics.
Reviewed Sommerfelt's career highlights, focusing on linguistic theories and methodologies.
Analyzed his impact on various language families, including Indo-European and Celtic languages.
Explored his recognition by UNESCO and his role in linguistics committees.
Sommerfelt significantly advanced the study of multiple language families, particularly Celtic and Scandinavian.
He emphasized the relationship between language and social structures, fostering the field of sociolinguistics.
His extensive publications, including reviews, showcased his broad influence across linguistic theory.

Abstract

Committee of Linguists (CIPL), vice-president of the International Council of Philosophy and Humane Sciences (CIPSH), editor of Lochlann, a Review of Celtic Studies, and review editor of N orsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap.He was president of the VIII International Congress of Linguists (Oslo, 1957).His services to linguistics included the recognition of our field by UNESCO through CIPSH, thanks to his membership first on the commission that planned the establishment of UNESCO in 1945UNESCO in , and then on its council from 1946UNESCO in -1952. .Sommerfelt's career as a linguist was marked by an unusual breadth of interests, supported by a well-nigh incredible diligence.One may gain some small impression of this by glancing at the selection of his articles printed as Diachronic and synchronic aspects of language (The Hague, 1962), hereafter abbreviated as DSAL.He made weighty contributions to the study of Indo-European comparative grammar, to Germanic (especially Scandinavian), and above all to Celtic languages.But he also went outside Indo-European, to the Caucasian and Australian languages.He wrote on all aspects of linguistic theory, synchronic as well as diachronic, from phonetics and phonemics to grammar and lexicography.He appears to have read virtually everything of any consequence in the field, as one may judge from the innumerable reviews which appeared over the years, especially in NTS.The field which was closest to his heart, however, was the one which some are now calling 'sociolinguistics'.As a pupil of Meillet and Durkheim, he emphasized from the beginning of his teaching and writing the importance of social structure in explaining linguistic structure and its evolution.The total acceptance of language as 'un fait social' was a cardinal tenet for him, and one to which many of his researches were directed.In this respect he differed widely from his friend and contemporary Louis Hjelmslev, whose aim it was to establish an 'immanent' linguistics, from which all such 'transcendental' considerations would be elimi-

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper