Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The two-process theory of detection, search, and attention presented by Schneider and Shiffrin is tested and extended in a series of experiments. The studies demonstrate the qualitative difference between two modes of information processing: automatic detection and controlled search. They trace the course of the learning of automatic detection, of categories, and of automaticattention responses. They show the dependence of automatic detection on attending responses and demonstrate how such responses interrupt controlled processing and interfere with the focusing of attention. The learning of categories is shown to improve controlled search performance. A general framework for human information processing is proposed; the framework emphasizes the roles of automatic and controlled processing. The theory is compared to and contrasted with extant models of search and attention.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shiffrin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec0685694de08494b754ec — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127
Richard M. Shiffrin
Institute for Cognitive Science Studies
Walter Schneider
University of Pittsburgh
Psychological Review
Indiana University Bloomington
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...