The escalating global challenge of waste management, combined with the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, has intensified interest in waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies as integrated solutions for sustainable energy recovery. This review critically examines advanced WtE technologies through three interconnected dimensions: the strength of the evidence base supporting performance and environmental claims, the challenges associated with scalability and system integration, and the implications of these technologies for net-zero energy transitions. The analysis covers thermochemical, biochemical, and hybrid conversion pathways, including pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal liquefaction, and anaerobic digestion, with particular emphasis on identifying inconsistencies in the literature and clarifying key uncertainties. A persistent gap between laboratory-scale performance and commercial-scale operation is identified and characterised across conversion pathways. Its principal drivers of feedstock heterogeneity, heat transfer limitations, and operational complexity are examined. Environmental assessments are shown to be highly sensitive to system boundary definitions and carbon accounting methodologies, with lifecycle results varying substantially depending on energy substitution assumptions and biogenic carbon treatment. The integration of WtE within circular economy frameworks demonstrates that energy recovery is most effective when positioned as a complement to material recycling rather than a substitute. The roles of combined heat and power configurations, district heating, carbon capture and storage, and emerging reactor technologies in advancing net-zero contributions are assessed. Significant data gaps are identified in long-term operational performance, modelling transparency, and reporting standardisation. The review concludes that WtE technologies represent valuable components of integrated waste and energy management systems, but their long-term contribution to decarbonisation requires careful system design, sound operational strategies, and harmonised performance evaluation frameworks.
Sharif H. Zein (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: