BACKGROUND: Occupational stress triggers psychological/physical health issues, elevating the risk of burnout and depression. This study explored the interrelationships among these constructs via network analysis (undirected/directed graphs). METHODS: A total of 1363 participants from Beijing hospitals and a university completed House and Rizzo's Work Stress Scale, Zung's Self-Report Depression Scale, and Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey. Graphical Gaussian Model and directed acyclic graphs (DAG) identified core/bridge/upstream nodes and causal pathways. RESULTS: Emotional exhaustion (EE) was the core node (expected influence = 2.11). The strongest edge was D11-D12 (weight = 0.46). EE, occupational stress 11, cynicism (CY), and personal accomplishment (PA) served as key bridging nodes. The network showed high stability (0.75). DAG identified upstream occupational stress 1/7/8, confirming direct occupational stress to depression pathways (emotional dysregulation model) and CY/PA mediated pathways (burnout structural theory). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted interventions on core/bridge/upstream nodes may prevent depression onset and progression in occupational settings.
Qiao et al. (Thu,) studied this question.