Purpose This study aims to explore the mediating mechanisms linking digital public service experience to citizen trust, focusing on Algeria as a developing country. It moves beyond correlational assumptions to analyze causal pathways in digital transformation. Design/methodology/approach A two-phase design is used. An exploratory documentary analysis of the “Digital Algeria 2030” strategy contextualizes institutional drivers and ensures culturally appropriate measurement. This is followed by a quantitative survey of 152 citizens, analyzed using regression and mediation to test a model where service quality affects satisfaction (H1), and trust is built via perceived administrative performance (H2) and procedural transparency (H3), with ease of use as a conditional factor (H4). Findings Results confirm distinct utilitarian and political evaluations. While service quality predicts satisfaction, institutional trust is not a direct outcome of digitalization. Trust is primarily fostered through perceived improvements in administrative performance and procedural transparency. Ease of use only indirectly influences trust by strengthening these perceptions. Research limitations/implications As a context-specific case with a nonprobabilistic sample, the study’s generalizability is limited. However, it contributes by: empirically distinguishing pathways to satisfaction vs institutional trust; extending procedural justice and design-reality gap frameworks to digital governance; and offering a mechanism-based perspective for developing economies. For policymakers, building trust requires focusing on transparency and performance, not just technology. Originality/value This research offers a novel, mechanism-based perspective by empirically testing key mediators in an understudied context. It challenges the direct-trust hypothesis and innovatively integrates policy analysis within a causal mediation model. The findings provide actionable insights, showing that building trust requires focusing on service performance and transparency, not merely technology deployment.
Noui et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: