The common root characteristic of CO2 and air pollutants in the power industry, both derived from fossil fuel combustion, provides a natural basis for their synergistic emission reduction. However, existing studies suffer from the lack of a multi-pollutant synergistic evaluation system and an imperfect emission reduction technology database, which hinder their ability to support low-cost and high-efficiency emission reduction practices in the industry. Targeting the minimization of synergistic emission reduction costs and the maximization of emission reduction effects, this study integrated the process and economic parameters of 11 power generation technologies and 55 pollutant control technologies to establish a full-chain energy conservation and emission reduction technology database for the power industry, through literature research, industry surveys, and data mining. Based on the definition of pollution equivalent in the Environmental Protection Tax Law, we innovatively developed an air pollutant equivalent normalization evaluation method and constructed a two-dimensional coordinate system comprehensive evaluation system for CO2 and air pollutants, enabling quantitative analysis and visual evaluation of the synergistic emission reduction effects of various technologies. The results show that new energy power generation technologies such as nuclear power and wind power, as well as O2/CO2 cycle combustion, ammonia-based desulfurization, and SNCR-SCR combined reduction technologies, exhibit excellent synergistic emission reduction performance for CO2 and multiple pollutants. In contrast, some conventional pollutant control technologies, such as the limestone-gypsum method and traditional electrostatic precipitation, have significant CO2 emission increase antagonistic effects. This study also completed the two-dimensional classification of 66 emission reduction technologies based on “emission reduction efficiency-economic cost”, identified application scenarios for different types of technologies, and proposed optimized paths for synergistic emission reduction adapted to the development of the power industry. The research findings fill the gap in quantitative standards for multi-pollutant synergistic emission reduction, provide theoretical support and detailed technical references for emission reduction technology selection and environmental policy formulation in the power industry, and help the industry achieve the dual development requirements of the “double carbon” goal and air quality improvement.
Yu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: