Background: Technological advancements have introduced virtual dissection tools such as the Anatomage Table into medical education. However, cadaveric dissection remains a traditional and integral component of anatomy learning. This study aimed to evaluate BAMS students’ perceptions of both methods in learning anatomy. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 232 undergraduate medical students from different academic years who had exposure to both the methods. Convenience sampling was employed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: Among the participants, 77.15% were female and 22.85% were male. The Anatomage Table was preferred for identifying smaller anatomical structures such as arteries (41.81%), veins (40.09%), nerves (38.79%), and lymph nodes (47.41%). In contrast, cadaveric dissection was favored for studying larger structures, including bones (71.55%), muscles (70.26%), joints (59.48%), ligaments (46.55%), and organs (75%). Dissection was also perceived as superior for understanding spatial relationships, anatomical variations, and clinical correlations, while the Anatomage Table was considered more time-efficient and useful for quick revision. Conclusion: While the Anatomage Table enhances visualization and understanding of finer anatomical details, cadaveric dissection remains the preferred method for studying larger structures and developing tactile and three-dimensional understanding. A blended approach integrating both methods may optimize anatomy education.
Dr. Sajina P. S.*1, Dr. Divya K.2, Ms. Sadhana Bhat3 (Fri,) studied this question.