This study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on government contracting from the perspective of Islamic law and jurisprudence, reviewing legal and Sharia provisions related to pandemics and their impact on contract execution. The study reviewed the applicability of the theory of force majeure and emergency circumstances to the pandemic in positive laws, and the resulting partial or total exemption from contractual obligations. Relevant jurisprudential rules, such as the principle of "harm is removed" and "hardship brings relief," were also analyzed, and their applicability to government contracts.The study concluded that the pandemic may constitute a force majeure that leads to the suspension or termination of some government contracts, depending on the nature of the obligations and contractual terms. The study also highlighted the flexibility of Islamic jurisprudence in addressing crises through mitigation mechanisms and fair settlement between parties. The study recommended the need to develop legislation to address future emergencies and enhance flexibility in government contracts to accommodate exceptional circumstances.
Naseef Hassan (Mon,) studied this question.