Abstract On April 29, 2026, Professor Lei Wang's team from Nanjing University published a paper in Nature, reporting the first observation of the "transdimensional anomalous Hall effect" in rhombohedrally stacked few-layer graphene. The discovery of an intermediate quantum state between two and three dimensions broke the traditional cognitive boundary of integer dimensions. Based on the original theoretical system of All-Things Physics (K-Physics), this paper conducts a paradigm-level in-depth review of this study. We first objectively summarize the experimental contributions and academic value of the original paper, pointing out that it is still trapped in the ontological presupposition that "dimension is an a priori geometric container", and cannot explain the dynamical origin of the critical layer number and the intrinsic mechanism of symmetry breaking. Then, starting from the W≡0 kinetic conservation axiom, we propose the core assertion that "the essence of dimension variation is the topological resonance between the kinetic correlation length and the system geometric size". Through tools such as Old-K/Little-k kinetic dichotomy, XYZ+T complex coordinate spacetime mapping, and entanglement-disentanglement double helix dynamics, we completely reconstruct the fundamental picture of the dimension-varying Hall effect. Finally, we give the cognitive entanglement index evaluation of the original study, propose 3 falsifiable quantitative theoretical predictions and 3 experimental improvement suggestions, and point out the direction for this research to leap to the "dimension engineering" paradigm. This paper is the first formal publication of the All-Things Physics theoretical system applied to frontier physics problems, aiming to establish a constructive dialogue channel between the original physical paradigm and the mainstream scientific community. Keywords: Transdimensional anomalous Hall effect; All-Things Physics; K-Physics; Kinetic correlation length; Topological resonance; Dimension emergence; Entanglement degree
Jian Wen (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: