Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: A minority of patients with stroke qualify for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 4.5-hour window. The safety and efficacy of IVT beyond this period have not been well studied. METHODS: ² values. RESULTS: =0%). Subanalyses yielded numerically higher odds of excellent functional outcomes when patients were selected with perfusion imaging (3 studies, OR, 1.45 95% CI, 1.08-1.94) compared with diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch (3 studies, OR, 1.34 95% CI, 0.94-1.91) and when treated with tenecteplase (3 studies, OR, 1.47 95% CI, 1.06-2.04) compared with alteplase (5 studies, OR, 1.38 95% CI, 1.08-1.78). CONCLUSIONS: IVT for ischemic stroke beyond 4.5 hours, without MT, led to increased odds of excellent and good functional outcomes compared with standard medical care, despite higher odds of sICH, and a nonsignificant numerical increase in mortality.
Günkan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.