Objectives/Goals: This poster will provide key insights from a landscape analysis examining resources for community-engaged research (CEnR) across three University of Michigan (U-M) campuses. Highlights will include notable gaps and limitations and how the analysis will inform future U-M CTSA CE programming to support CEnR efforts at U-M. Methods/Study Population: A landscape analysis of CE resources available at U-M was conducted as part of a multipronged approach to inform CTSA CE services. Through a comprehensive review of U-M websites, the analysis identified 83 CEnR programs and services across Ann Arbor, Flint, and Dearborn campuses of U-M. Programs were mapped by audience (faculty, staff, students, and community partners), topic, and service type. Assessment of distribution, website clarity, and ease of navigation further illuminated opportunities to improve support and efficiency to better meet the needs of those engaged in CEnR at U-M. Results/Anticipated Results: The landscape analysis identified 83 CEnR-related programs and services at U-M, most concentrated in Ann Arbor, and with the highest concentration in a few units. Data analysis services, resources for sustaining and sharing work, and structured grant feedback were relatively rare. Availability of funding for community-focused initiatives was infrequent and generally under 10, 000. Over 70% of resources were available to faculty or students, 18% were available to the community, and just under 13% were open to staff. Findings will be used by MICHR to identify opportunities for future CE initiatives. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The poster outlines a landscape analysis framework and process that can be replicated by other CTSAs to assess institutional CEnR resources. This approach helps identify gaps and develop supports that meet the evolving needs of research teams and the community partners they collaborate with.
Truax et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: