Objectives/Goals: To enhance collaboration, communication, and research professional development in a newly aligned academic learning health system by implementing two innovative training programs – Leadership in Focus and Research Mentor Academy – that build leadership and mentoring capacity across the research workforce. Methods/Study Population: To elevate and support research leadership and mentoring development across a large, multi-state academic health system, we launched two complementary programs. Leadership in Focus is a monthly virtual series featuring interviews with enterprise leaders, offering insights into leadership, strategy, and team science. Mentor Academy is a 10-week virtual course that provides formal training through skill-building, discussions, and guest speakers. Aligned with national best practices, it emphasizes communication and mentee-focused career development across the translational spectrum. Results/Anticipated Results: Both programs have shown early success in increasing engagement, awareness, and leadership competency. Leadership in Focus has drawn growing attendance from researchers, staff, and clinicians, fueling internal networking opportunities. The Research Mentor Academy participants bring strong representation from across departments and campuses. Participant feedback indicates improved confidence in mentoring, greater clarity in career advancement strategies, and expanded professional networks. These initiatives are creating new entry points for leadership development across the research enterprise, contributing to a stronger, more connected learning health system. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Through strong leadership and mentoring training, these programs strengthen collaboration and skill development of the translational research workforce. The success of these programs fosters a culture of learning and emphasizes the value of professional growth in an academic learning health system.
Newcomb et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: