Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper studies the problem of efficiently schedulling fully strict (i.e., well-structured) multithreaded computations on parallel computers. A popular and practical method of scheduling this kind of dynamic MIMD-style computation is “work stealing,” in which processors needing work steal computational threads from other processors. In this paper, we give the first provably good work-stealing scheduler for multithreaded computations with dependencies. Specifically, our analysis shows that the expected time to execute a fully strict computation on P processors using our work-stealing scheduler is T 1 / P + O ( T ∞ , where T 1 is the minimum serial execution time of the multithreaded computation and ( T ∞ is the minimum execution time with an infinite number of processors. Moreover, the space required by the execution is at most S 1 P , where S 1 is the minimum serial space requirement. We also show that the expected total communication of the algorithm is at most O ( PT ∞ ( 1 + n d ) S max ), where S max is the size of the largest activation record of any thread and n d is the maximum number of times that any thread synchronizes with its parent. This communication bound justifies the folk wisdom that work-stealing schedulers are more communication efficient than their work-sharing counterparts. All three of these bounds are existentially optimal to within a constant factor.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert D. Blumofe
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Charles E. Leiserson
IIT@MIT
Journal of the ACM
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The University of Texas at Austin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Blumofe et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ffdcf2e4618ba4162d9432 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/324133.324234