Abstract Background Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) refers to a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders with more than 90 causative genes. Clinically, HSP is classified into pure and complicated forms. Pure forms are characterized primarily by lower-limb spasticity and weakness, whereas complicated forms include additional neurological or non-neurological symptoms alongside spasticity and weakness. We aimed to characterize the clinical and genetic landscapes of HSP in an Iranian cohort. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 103 unrelated clinically suspected HSP probands. Multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was performed to validate identified copy number variants (CNVs) in two probands. Results 71 pathogenic/likely pathogenic and VUS variants were identified in 81 probands; total genetically solved probands: 78.6%. Among these solved cases, 64 probands harbored variants in known HSP genes, 14 had variants in other neuromuscular/neurodegenerative-related genes, and the remaining 3 probands carried variants in four novel candidate genes including NMNAT1, SEMA3A, KCNJ14 , and EMP3 . Among all 71 identified genomic variants, two were CNVs and one was a trinucleotide repeat expansion. Taken together, these variants were located in 37 genes; 21 of these genes have been previously implicated in HSP, and four common HSP subtypes (SPG11, SPG4, SPG7, and SPG15) accounted for ~40% of our cohort. Conclusions This study demonstrates significant clinical and genetic heterogeneity of HSP within our cohort. In addition to variants in 21 known HSP-related genes, we identified variants in 14 genes related to other neurological disorders -highlighting shared biological pathways- as well as variants in four novel candidate genes. Notably, a genetic diagnosis could not be established in 22 probands, underscoring that additional, as yet unidentified genes likely contribute to HSP pathogenesis.
Davarzani et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: