In the late spring of 1900, the Howard family—a father, a mother, and their four children—arrived by horse and wagon in Salt Lake City from Colorado. The Howards were unknown in the city and had no family or friends to greet them upon their arrival. The family were not public figures or famous in any way, and yet two newspapers announced their arrival and devoted many column inches to describing their daily activities. The Salt Lake Herald declared, “Family in Distress: Six People from Colorado in Dire Want for Food,” and the slightly more restrained Salt Lake Tribune headline announced a “Case of Destitution.”1 The Howards were living in a tent “on the old dog and pony show grounds” just south of downtown since their arrival in the city a few weeks earlier.2 The Herald described their living quarters in vivid detail, perhaps in hopes of eliciting sympathy from readers: “The tent in which the family is living presented a spectacle of abject want. It contained only a few worn quilts and some cooking utensils, which constituted the entire household articles possessed by the people. The only morsel of food in the tent was a small quantity of flour. The children had scarcely enough clothes to cover their bodies, and up to Thursday night had had scarcely anything to eat for several days.”3 Poverty was hardly unknown in Utah, and the state had a robust patchwork of services that might aid the Howard family. However, these newspaper articles highlight the shock of seeing a family living on the streets of a bustling city. Even though Utah operated three poorhouses to shelter the indigent, and hobo jungles were a common occurrence on the outskirts of town, residents of the city were not accustomed to seeing homelessness up close. The Howards were certainly not the only needy family in Utah, but their plight helps illustrate the network of relief that was available to homeless people in Utah at the turn of the century and hints at what was to come in later decades.Although the nuances of homelessness change over time, historian Kenneth Kusmer offers a simple but unifying definition as a “lack of a fixed abode, an impoverished lifestyle, and, in most cases, weak or nonexistent family support.”4 This overarching definition captures those who had no home to call their own and who slept on the streets, at poor farms, in hobo jungles, and at flophouses while also emphasizing the compounding social and economic factors that make homelessness a challenging life circumstance to emerge from. Homelessness is a transitory state, one that a person may find themselves weaving in and out of over months or years, and a person often utilizes a complex, disconnected web of resources to survive and hopefully regain economic stability. This disconnected web of resources makes understanding the history of homelessness very difficult. Historians must uncover this history by sifting through bureaucratic records, newspaper articles, city directories, police reports, photographs, and the scant archival records left behind by charities and helping individuals.This article examines the history of homelessness in Utah from 1852 to 1968, from the first territorial law designating responsibility for the poor to the expansion of federal response to poverty during Lyndon B. Johnson's War on Poverty. The first 116 years of Utah's European settlement reveal similarities to nationwide efforts to address homelessness as well as actions that were influenced by Utah's unique cultural and social climate. I survey early laws and policies dictating care for the homeless, government-sponsored programs like poor farms and outdoor relief, municipal lodging houses, and charitable organizations, as well as political organizing of Utah's hobo college and the anarchist-run Joe Hill House of Hospitality.In 1851, during Utah's first territorial legislative session, officials addressed the fundamental issues facing the new territory. These involved the mundane, but necessary, work of establishing city and county boundaries, water and timber regulations, public schools, and marriage and divorce laws. Alongside these important orders of business was the first law dictating care for the poor. Territorial legislators assigned care for the poor to the counties, writing that counties should “oversee the poor . . . take the care, custody and management of insane persons . . . who are incapable of conducting their own affairs, and of their estate both real and personal.”5 In addition, counties were also responsible for burials for indigent people. In this regard, Utah was following a well-established model for determining the responsibility for the care of the indigent. Placing the responsibility to care for the poor on counties, cities, or to poor laws that were from poor laws in early as had responsibility for the care of the poor to often at a or These laws to to the care of the poor and to who was for poor It is that in the first of the territorial also establishing who was responsible for the care of the of the or for of Utah's counties were responsible for the care of their most in or to cities, as Salt Lake City or a more robust network of to new counties in of relief was Utah counties, not that a poor person or in a county was enough to for to the territorial some of the first business of Salt Lake was to the care of the poor. from as the first records county issues as and the the county were The records to residents for in and and for and The the first four years of county It that the first response to homelessness was to to shelter for the and in a small for services the territorial the laws and in in the first years of settlement were no In the was in the of an economic Utah was and the homelessness was also on the Utah's and were to a in poverty in the years of the The territorial the for care for the poor in response to the and a to In the for the of . . . that poor who is to a in of any or by the father, mother, or of poor person . . . or of them of However, the family to their indigent to the county to cover the of care, which not The in responsibility for the care or of indigent not to the impoverished It is from records many people poor relief were by family or this was or family were is also that the the and poor. People who are to for themselves to or were of care from family or but those who from or any were not to The poor find themselves for the of their though the to for their The that some homeless and had a life of poverty and homelessness was in this Homelessness a in the the of the and the of a life in newspaper articles that homeless were and incapable of or their These homeless in since were to the for their and were not as of care and children had many more resources available to to that not for first of laws and in Utah the response to homelessness from the the territorial the for services for homeless and of the responsibility to “oversee the three counties in from a few to for more one to their to the were the most common of relief for homelessness in the poor were of poor laws over by and the in was in in poorhouses from their which to the poor through and poorhouses in were and more to the old and were common in the but as the the for an home to care for the farms, like those in Utah, were from poorhouses in their to care for the indigent. However, as the life was often and Utah had three poor farms, operated by the county in which was The first was in Salt Lake in by in and in in Salt Lake to a The Salt Lake Herald this poor come to one of the of the as is the of an to most people. Salt Lake that to public the of to in to the the of persons and to for themselves the few years that care for them and in this county are perhaps or who are a upon the county to this the county had responsibility to who for their the the county a a that operated an for and were the county in Salt Lake a on two and a downtown for The as residents of poorhouses were often and the Salt Lake in article a that was the on the and the a The article that were and that the to the is on the the The residents the of the and from the the only two this the had but the the available In an article county of the the of the an and for the for the and of the this the had and that were in a that should not and to the is of the county that very was to and well care The for the county to an for more to the and to are no records from any residents of Salt Lake to their articles at the public the and of were article in the county residents that of the House and a by was by the police and to It is that residents of poorhouses were a that and no the that Salt Lake residents of these residents of county poor farms were to come and this had and were to the by the county but or the state as the insane living in the was not and was as a to an indigent person a to that the was often over the were and often the poor were people issues or people who very of relief and from the Salt Lake and the which in were for poor farms in Utah to their bustling and to that an of However, county and to a more to small and from a However, had a history of for those who not care for and the poor is an of this care for the needy in a county a for residents to The county and to the as the House of This Utah's by years and both an early and to a for residents to records over the years that were small for the care of the residents of this but no records survive that what life was like for those to Alongside the House of indigent residents to for and up to However, the the and in the county for to to a poor poor was a in the that indigent were the poor to care for indigent newspaper article in the are of this care while may for what are not The is in some by friends or and perhaps is the was in but the people and the the the and poor was the However, is no that the county was by people to the that residents of were to care for their who not care for months of county a in and the for The to the county that the of by a It upon a three in a and also of . . . a water from the and The county Utah to the to the and poor in The and the the to a and an and the The poor was for years the county in for The was and the a poor farms a in their the care for the indigent to of the residents were in were for their The two were to and were to the state in was to for their care and Salt Lake poor farms both during the first of the and were more like for the but poor. in while Salt Lake in The an to the poor in Utah and a in for the counties in Utah what was as outdoor relief is the is not to an as a to services and in many for as and and for However, of the aid available was not to those who were homeless and was to a person their home and to the actions of the Howard who in this helps the web of outdoor relief that was available to as well as the and of this the arrival from Howard first is for aid from Salt Lake and on 1900, an county the to their The that Howard was years old and in but was a The the presented in the newspapers that the family few and that their family were not in a to Howard that two weeks later the family had not any relief from the may the family was a It is that the county that the resources for and food not this family living on the actions of the county in a the from the Howard in the to from an or family that had the and state of people had family that the first of to the county The also often the to a and that was In the for the that the family to the but the not This first is living . . . not anything for this In this the county a of and that had many in the some of outdoor relief to or during However, the Howards had no had to to for for county was Howard to The newspaper articles state that to to for of food that were for the the family was in the of a for food at the had a in cities, and of this new of people had to Utah through newspaper that was and a work City and officials that food or to a on the that person from through the and to to their Howard to the police as a food and in the and the turn to police for shelter The often were an that hardly a and some simple the police were and to on the to police to through The that Howard for through the county indigent shelter at police and to the patchwork of outdoor relief services that people homelessness call upon in the early century and the of some also in and These were often more of a no and poor for the who shelter Salt Lake City had many of from to to that had a of However, these and were not to address the of homelessness for those who had no to some that Salt Lake City a municipal lodging homeless and shelter at no in the as and municipal lodging as the to police lodging for the However, that municipal lodging had one for the often had to and their clothes and also had to some small of as or This of the work often at but the that poorhouses to since in lodging were and newspaper in of municipal lodging as early as to at one municipal lodging from the police who no for a It often that people who are not city find themselves in of just a lodging and children are and and for police It is not to them to them a lodging police quarters to Salt Lake a municipal lodging this and the was years the of an for municipal lodging houses, to Utah from to on the on the municipal lodging in and that a night of lodging was not but was through the Salt Lake worn clothes and to for who had to Utah from Colorado and that had what had from their on and as as and were to the of from a of newspaper articles call to in the Salt Lake Herald one Salt Lake is to the to a municipal lodging for the who are by the of a city. is no in a municipal lodging and may that a city that is find any to yet is a at to the city to only that any city in Utah the municipal lodging model in the a are simple that as the on to of in that the in had for homeless the not The was operated by an relief the The relief that to the city was and the a to from this is no of municipal lodging in on charities at the turn of the century to those shelter and Utah to to the of the homeless charities in to the The charities out of the social and to the of and through This was of a nationwide to the homeless on the that the homeless were poor were or to and that by a work in the their and life were charities of in the late and early the most and of these charities in Utah is the It as an of the work that were and the had on later of relief in Salt Lake City in and the was for their and the to to their The Salt Lake Herald are to of the of in town, from the work of of in and of on the . . . them come no and some a of the is in Salt and for a few to and the in in to as and to to the of the poor. The their and as or and the in the three and The as was in the in and had in the in Utah, the in and a had of the In early the first shelter for homeless at in downtown Salt The shelter and lodging to at the of the not but these resources lodging were and had to or work to food or The of was for their by in the and four of at The the to in an to on charitable and public the of a newspaper a of the and described the The shelter had a but a the that is is and for to the needy as well as and well quarters on the first and The had a a and had a that this time, the had for to but that had to turn two months the Salt Lake a and “The work by the is in the of the the Salt Lake Tribune The the of the on and a for In to the shelter also had a to work out for a their while In just four months first the that had for and The also an and had or for of and The shelter which was an for at the The to of in the and a new for up the and was an shelter and was to the of Salt homeless is no at in to their of the the who had in like and for more to from and the and charities were in the of homeless and in Utah, not of the their services Joe the and the in “The and the In at the to as and them of more eat and that the and on in the the and and on the on the are of the of during the of the hobo and show the of hobo that had the to a in the early century and is to and However, historian the the three the the and the three of the in the and the in the and . . . the two was the . . . were by and more and political their The hobo was the in the and and Utah were during the most famous hobo was as the was a family and was the of a and the of the who the famous a at and and a life of and to the hobo the in and like political the of the that and the in economic However, the that and was the to were the and in first to Utah to in the to not only for and but also food and shelter to In at a as the in that the hobo a to and a to eat is on from one city to I to a may a and a The Salt Lake of the was on and the was a later on is the Salt Lake that the a on but the in the out of in in a at This was to the to the is by and of the the Salt Lake announced on for from county and while a county a city officials the as a not only for the but also for the The city that of the city and county as lodging houses, at the In to work at charities like the that to take on like and to the for an article described the of the more had had from the city and the were in a a the The were at on a water for the and a was for in the of the The for and the is in the which new to work on establishing this in and the hobo more a new on and political what were in to and the also operated hobo which were that may in what the four of . . . social and public The were on and and the of a college Salt Lake hobo college as “The and “The and the and and as well as a on the of the relief to the the poor and and is to also for and and Salt hobo college was or in It that the first the college on their the the in Salt Lake City in the that was at the The on the of the state and a that to the the to take up the of The also of to at the that at It the of that the to The was the the following in Utah's resources for homeless and and those who themselves on the of homelessness for the first Utah's was the in the in out at and through the of the The first years of the had the county relief in Utah, and federal relief was in However, though were and relief the of had a to call home the of the small of this was to the of who or In and work in of in cases, and from the were on the in and In a of on the state to for for and an to were of the and a the state that for during the of the actions and and from the hobo and is the and the records not in any is through newspaper articles their this the the state and . . . for the of a social as well as of the following relief, no for on and of and the The was who should for the of of “The to any the of the and this responsibility the and the not at the state but also the to a persons the and county to the . . . of and family of for of The article that the that the for and that the of the indigent poor to food and shelter come first The that was no law but homeless, the family the responsibility of the county of the state laws shelter and food for the indigent poor. This show of and not from but the county relief for the article Salt Lake officials the of the in are over in the county who the county no which to these from to several on the City and and out the no for food or This should not in state of The of the the of and in a legislative the the to a to the and of indigent The a that county to aid The aid for a to a for a to the in for not on indigent The the of the the county of and the of by that and who through no of their own are should a to home for their The the by a of to and law later that the and of the and is that this law to the Utah state It a to during the but a that were in Utah and were to the response to homelessness during the two and the Joe Hill House of in Salt Lake for the who was on a in Utah in out of the the a care for those who Joe Hill to and to in the city and state from services by charities and the Joe Hill House aid aid political and the to and were not or not state or for their and their in the the Joe Hill House of was not any was an political out of a of like and Joe Hill House of was in a on downtown and was and small that the House and three a at the the House and charitable and state described the often on the to only one night a and the police the in the at The Joe Hill House them in any and for as as to the state The House only had two no and no was often to their in a small from the for an at the House of in that any and was I House was very in early years, of on the and more at and to from and that the House was the and an the social and often to the House to the the House was was often as the and The House was to from downtown in and in In an from a the Salt Lake City of the many the House of had and of and and the House to was and on to a to and three “The and to make some which I and to the on the to I what I or I I to and up a I and the I the and them out the out the I anything but was were In had a on a new home and was to make a city by the and the that to only The the not any on In a column in the city “The are and I take from are to the of the law and are in but . . . I to the of life the had to years in the Joe Hill House of for in this time, the House was from downtown on and and was no as as to that few from the and the House only a few in Salt Lake City but a and a in at the of Joe Hill House of is a unique of relief for homelessness that was not from the or The House was a political that to poverty at the House was only in for years, in Salt and aid up to address the of the of the Joe Hill House of in the to Utah's first efforts at to the and of The and Salt Lake poor farms their in and and most charities had to survive more a few years at a the and the the survive these early and the and more on federal to their to In first of the Lyndon B. War on which was of to a Johnson's War on Poverty not address but many programs as the and which the of and and the War on Poverty just years the state that in the late and early This was the of as in to homelessness in the In Utah a to which was a the political had and Salt Lake state which the of Utah described as a to these homelessness in Utah to The an from the in the of who were In to the patchwork of as the and the to services to the of life on the out of the of the Joe Hill House of aid as Salt Lake and Salt Lake to to food and to people in It is the that Utah's to homelessness take in of orders at homeless people but Utah's early to homelessness a to issues
Julia Huddleston (Thu,) studied this question.