Constitutional morality has emerged as a central interpretive doctrine in Indian constitutional law, shaping judicial reasoning in matters involving fundamental rights, governance, and social justice. Although not explicitly defined in the Constitution, the doctrine has evolved through judicial pronouncements and scholarly discourse. This paper critically examines the origin, evolution, and application of constitutional morality in India, focusing on its role in resolving conflicts between societal norms and constitutional values. By analyzing landmark judgments and contemporary developments, the paper evaluates the strengths and limitations of constitutional morality as a judicial tool. It also incorporates empirical trends, case data, and contemporary debates to assess whether constitutional morality promotes constitutional supremacy or risks judicial overreach.
Dr. Geetanjali Verma (Fri,) studied this question.